Tests

Description:

Running tests as and when required allows developers to ensure their changes have not broken anything. Various different level of tests gives a range of feedback.

Scores:

Ease of Use
Maintainability
Value for Money
Impact

Pros:

  • Reflects code quality
  • High amount of re-use
  • Covers many scenarios

Cons:

  • Needs continual investment
  • Skill & maturity required
  • Needs additional Maintenance

Changes:

  • Added Con "Needs additional Maintenance" (LLKD 2017)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What's all this about?

When someone says 'feedback', what's the first thing you think of? It's the retrospective, right? Similar to a magic trick, this is due to preconditioning that makes this a predictable answer. It may be our 'go to' feedback mechanism - but it is not the only one. It might not even be the best one, depending on your goal. We want to inspire you to look a little differently at your team and organisation. You work in a sea of feedback, some obvious - some not. Many teams consider only a small fraction of the available feedback to improve their behaviours. This website compliments a workshop which provides a simple process that allows an organisation to explore alternative and often ignored sources of feedback and decide how they might use and manage the information they uncover. The session is agile agnostic; it is not specific to any particular method. The inspiration for this was actually Top Trumps, a popular card game from our youth. For each type of fe...
Read more